Difference between revisions of "PITMinutes 04-25-2016"
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
future ops. | future ops. | ||
| − | Why have we lost 15-25 MV/module compared to | + | Why have we lost 15-25 MV/module compared to commissioning period? |
2. Gradient Maintenance Team (Mounts) | 2. Gradient Maintenance Team (Mounts) | ||
Revision as of 09:58, 9 May 2016
Attendance
S. Cooper, M. Drury, A. Freyberger, C. Hovater, A. Hutton, R. Geng, G. Krafft, F. Marhauser, C. Mounts, R. Nelson, T. Plawski, T. Powers, C. Reece, R. Rimmer, T. Rielly, S. Suhring
Agenda and Notes
1. Operations Status and Summary
OPS Staytreat Focus on reliability
Shutdown for open house started
Radiation not as bad as has been near C100s
Running lower gradient on suspected high FEs.
Users informed near term 1050/linac instead of 1090 11.6 GeV
People considering optimizing on radiation for future ops.
Why have we lost 15-25 MV/module compared to commissioning period?
2. Gradient Maintenance Team (Mounts)
Scope Creep?
3. FE/Particulate Meeting Report (Geng)
Follow on activity and future planning
4. C100 Gradient Recovery Planning
He processing the rest?
Capture degradation rate?
Other ideas?
