Difference between revisions of "PITMinutes 04-25-2016"
(→Attendance) |
|||
| (19 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Attendance == | == Attendance == | ||
| − | + | S. Cooper, M. Drury, A. Freyberger, C. Hovater, A. Hutton, R. Geng, G. Krafft, F. Marhauser, C. Mounts, R. Nelson, T. Plawski, T. Powers, C. Reece, R. Rimmer, T. Reilly, S. Suhring | |
== Agenda and Notes == | == Agenda and Notes == | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Focus on reliability | Focus on reliability | ||
| − | + | Shutdown for open house started | |
| − | + | Radiation not as bad as has been near C100s | |
| − | + | Running lower gradient on suspected high FEs. | |
| − | + | Users informed near term 1050/linac instead of 1090 11.6 GeV | |
| + | People considering optimizing on radiation for | ||
| + | future ops. | ||
| − | + | Why have we lost 15-25 MV/module compared to commissioning period? | |
| − | 2. Gradient Maintenance Team(Mounts) | + | 2. Gradient Maintenance Team (Mounts) |
| − | * [http://casa.jlab.org/LINACPIT/ | + | * [http://casa.jlab.org/LINACPIT/Gradient_Stakeholder's_Update_LRPIT_CIM.pptx Clyde Mount's Condensed Gradient Maintenance Team Update] |
| + | |||
| + | * [http://casa.jlab.org/LINACPIT/Full_Gradient_Stakeholder's_Update.pptx Full Gradient Maintenance Team Update] | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [http://casa.jlab.org/LINACPIT/Copy_of_Copy_of_CategorizedIssuesList_2016-03-17_REV1_CIM.xlsx Gradient Maintenance Team Spread Sheet] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Scope Creep? | ||
3. FE/Particulate Meeting Report (Geng) | 3. FE/Particulate Meeting Report (Geng) | ||
| Line 30: | Line 38: | ||
Follow on activity and future planning | Follow on activity and future planning | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | 4. C100 Gradient Recovery Planning | ||
| + | |||
| + | He processing the rest? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Capture degradation rate? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Other ideas? | ||
== Action Items == | == Action Items == | ||
Latest revision as of 10:26, 23 May 2016
Attendance
S. Cooper, M. Drury, A. Freyberger, C. Hovater, A. Hutton, R. Geng, G. Krafft, F. Marhauser, C. Mounts, R. Nelson, T. Plawski, T. Powers, C. Reece, R. Rimmer, T. Reilly, S. Suhring
Agenda and Notes
1. Operations Status and Summary
OPS Staytreat Focus on reliability
Shutdown for open house started
Radiation not as bad as has been near C100s
Running lower gradient on suspected high FEs.
Users informed near term 1050/linac instead of 1090 11.6 GeV
People considering optimizing on radiation for future ops.
Why have we lost 15-25 MV/module compared to commissioning period?
2. Gradient Maintenance Team (Mounts)
Scope Creep?
3. FE/Particulate Meeting Report (Geng)
Follow on activity and future planning
4. C100 Gradient Recovery Planning
He processing the rest?
Capture degradation rate?
Other ideas?
