Difference between revisions of "PITMinutes 05-07-2018"
(→Agenda and Notes) |
|||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
why people are reducing them and work through mitigations. | why people are reducing them and work through mitigations. | ||
| − | 2. C100 Performance Studies (Solopova | + | 2. C100 Performance Studies (Solopova) |
[https://casa.jlab.org/LINACPIT/C100_Performance.pdf C100 Performance Talk] | [https://casa.jlab.org/LINACPIT/C100_Performance.pdf C100 Performance Talk] | ||
| − | 3. C100 Refurbishment Planning (Freyberger) | + | 3. C100 Quenches (Powers) |
| + | |||
| + | [https://casa.jlab.org/LINACPIT/C100_Quenches.pdf Ideas regarding C100 Quenches] | ||
| + | |||
| + | 4. C100 Refurbishment Planning (Freyberger) | ||
[https://casa.jlab.org/LINACPIT/Brainstorming_on_C100_Refurbishment.eml Items Request Email] | [https://casa.jlab.org/LINACPIT/Brainstorming_on_C100_Refurbishment.eml Items Request Email] | ||
| Line 30: | Line 34: | ||
[https://casa.jlab.org/LINACPIT/C100_Refurbishment_Brainstorming_List.pptx C100 Refurbishment Brainstorming List] | [https://casa.jlab.org/LINACPIT/C100_Refurbishment_Brainstorming_List.pptx C100 Refurbishment Brainstorming List] | ||
| − | + | 5. Draft Cryomodule Specification (Benesch) | |
Jay has written up a set of goals for the cryomodules: | Jay has written up a set of goals for the cryomodules: | ||
[https://casa.jlab.org/LINACPIT/2017CM_specR2.pdf Draft Cryomodule Specification] | [https://casa.jlab.org/LINACPIT/2017CM_specR2.pdf Draft Cryomodule Specification] | ||
| − | + | 6. Draft Acceptance Criteria (Legg) | |
Bob shared the LCLS II module acceptance criteria that the | Bob shared the LCLS II module acceptance criteria that the | ||
Revision as of 08:26, 2 May 2018
Attendance
R. Bachimanchi, K. Baggett, M. Drury, A. Freyberger, R. Geng, A. Hutton, G. Krafft, A. Kimber, R. Legg, C. Mounts, R. Nelson, T. Plawski, T. Powers, C. Reece, T. Reilly, R. Rimmer, and A. Solopova.
Agenda and Notes
1. Operations Status and Summary/Review (Freyberger)
High average current limits remain. Usually A runs 22.5 muA and C runs 50-60 muA. Seems more and more solid that the Hall C current limit is 70-75 muA, independent of the Hall A current. And the main trips are from beam loss. So focus is shifting back to injector. Today, bunch length measurements are being made for the different Hall bunches. Recent work points to longitudinal phase space tails causing high average current trips. Is there a better diagnostic for these?
Anna will be working on getting a handle on OPS-initiated reductions in the C100 cavity gradients. First try to understand why people are reducing them and work through mitigations.
2. C100 Performance Studies (Solopova)
3. C100 Quenches (Powers)
4. C100 Refurbishment Planning (Freyberger)
C100 Refurbishment Brainstorming List
5. Draft Cryomodule Specification (Benesch)
Jay has written up a set of goals for the cryomodules: Draft Cryomodule Specification
6. Draft Acceptance Criteria (Legg)
Bob shared the LCLS II module acceptance criteria that the LCLS II project is working under. We should perhaps adopt something similar for C75? (Discuss Pros and Cons)
LCLS II Module Acceptance Criteria
Action Items
Leadership of quenches. Offline discussion.
Complete C75 Module Specifications (Marhauser, Benesch, Krafft)
C100 Refurbishment Project for the future?
