Difference between revisions of "PITMinutes 08-17-2015"
(New page: == Attendance == R. Bachimanchi, J. Benesch, A. Freyberger, R. Geng, C. Hovater, G. Krafft, F. Marhauser, C. Mounts, T. Plawski, R. Rimmer, T. Powers, H. Wang, H. Zhang == Agenda and Not...) |
|||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
SRF staff are national treasure; best on planet. They need to grow. | SRF staff are national treasure; best on planet. They need to grow. | ||
| − | |||
2. Module RF Soak Planning (R. Bachimanchi) | 2. Module RF Soak Planning (R. Bachimanchi) | ||
Revision as of 09:17, 17 August 2015
Attendance
R. Bachimanchi, J. Benesch, A. Freyberger, R. Geng, C. Hovater, G. Krafft, F. Marhauser, C. Mounts, T. Plawski, R. Rimmer, T. Powers, H. Wang, H. Zhang
Agenda and Notes
1. Operations Status and Summary
Cryo systems are being repaired and checked out. Additional vain bending in CHL 2 observed. Repairs started in parallel in CHL 1 repairs. Tentatively same restart in fall.
Drury thinks one module behind, Arne perhaps thinks it's more like 3. With 3 crews, maybe a week or two delay to ops. Also, looking for cavities to not He process.
New results from Cornell in Archive on surface treatments in archive. Need to digest.
S&T review. No recommendations from committee. Lots of probing on the accelerator improvement plan. Consider 2 C-100s for performance improvement instead of He process et al to get big jumps in gradient. Good argument for continuing C-75. Will need to investigate this.
SRF staff are national treasure; best on planet. They need to grow.
2. Module RF Soak Planning (R. Bachimanchi)
- Lively discussion surrounding talk
- Microphonics in R100
3. Gradient degradation: root causes and in-situ recovery techniques (Geng)
- Useful guidance and Exercise. Please complete surveys
