Difference between revisions of "PITMinutes 10-07-2019"
(→Agenda and Notes) |
(→Agenda and Notes) |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
[https://casa.jlab.org/LINACPIT/HallC_FY20_reqs_benesch.pdf Hall C Run Requirements (Benesch)] | [https://casa.jlab.org/LINACPIT/HallC_FY20_reqs_benesch.pdf Hall C Run Requirements (Benesch)] | ||
− | Comments: A High current (150 muA) 1 pass running. Not too much stress! | + | Comments: Test early at 300 muA will bge tried. |
+ | A High current (150 muA) 1 pass running. Not too much stress! | ||
+ | 30 muA to C is a target max. | ||
+ | A could run at lower energy with benefit. | ||
+ | High current parity quality. trip interaction with target not bad. | ||
+ | |||
Revision as of 13:19, 7 October 2019
Attendance
R. Bachimanchi, K. Baggett, J. Benesch, E. Daly, M. Drury, C. Hovater, R. Geng, C. Ginsburg, G. Krafft, F. Marhauser, C. Mounts, T. Plawski, T. Powers, C. Reece, R. Rimmer, A. Solopova, and .
Agenda and Notes
1. Extended PIT Meeting (Resumption of Operations)
1:00 Goal for Meeting (Ginsburg)
Comments:
1:10 Experiment Requirements and Desires for next running periods (HALL APLs, Grames)
Hall B Run Requirements (Tiefenback)
Hall B Run Requirements (Tiefenback)
Hall C Run Requirements (Benesch)
Comments: Test early at 300 muA will bge tried. A High current (150 muA) 1 pass running. Not too much stress! 30 muA to C is a target max. A could run at lower energy with benefit. High current parity quality. trip interaction with target not bad.
1:25 Performance Expectations in Relocated Modules (Drury)
Expected Performance After CM Swaps (Drury)
1:50 RF Configuration after SAD (Hovater)
Comments:
1:55 Gradient Choice at Turnon (Benesch)
Fall Polarization Options (Benesch)
Fall Turnon Gradient Choice (Benesch)
2:05 Present Gradient Limitations (Drury)
Data from Commissioning (Drury)
2:25 Gradient Change Instructions for OPS (Solopova)
Gradient Change Instruction for OPS (Solopova)
Comments:
2:40 Energy Reach (Baggett)
Comments:
2:50 CEBAF Performance Plan (Michaud)
Gradient Change Instruction for OPS (Michaud)
Comments: