Difference between revisions of "Super-ferric Dipole and CIC Conductor Topic Meeting (March 14, 2017)"

From CASA Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
<table cellspacing="10">
 
<table cellspacing="10">
 
<tr><td>9:30-9:45</td>
 
<tr><td>9:30-9:45</td>
     <td>Updates on / confirmation of requirements for Booster and Ion Collider Ring Magnets – 3T and proposed 6T dipoles (aperture, field strength, field quality, ramp rate, others)([http://casa.jlab.org/MEIC%20meeting/sf_magnet_meeting_20170314/Overview_Michalski.pptx slides])
+
     <td>Updates on / confirmation of requirements for Booster and Ion Collider Ring Magnets – 3T and proposed 6T dipoles (aperture, field strength, field quality, ramp rate, others)[http://casa.jlab.org/MEIC%20meeting/sf_magnet_meeting_20170314/Overview_Michalski.pptx slides]
 
</td>
 
</td>
 
     <td>T. Michalski</td></tr>
 
     <td>T. Michalski</td></tr>

Revision as of 14:55, 17 March 2017

Superferric Dipole and CIC Conductor Topics

9:30-9:45 Updates on / confirmation of requirements for Booster and Ion Collider Ring Magnets – 3T and proposed 6T dipoles (aperture, field strength, field quality, ramp rate, others)slides T. Michalski
9:45-10:30 Status on CIC Conductor Development P. McIntyre
10:30-11:15 Status and Plans for Building/Testing 3T, Fast Ramp Superferric Model Dipole Cold Mass P. McIntyre
11:15-12:00 6T Dipole Budgetary Cost Estimate and Superferric Dipole FOA Proposal Discussion P. McIntyre/T. Michalski

Interaction Region Topics

1:30-2:00 IR Magnet Requirements(slides) V. Morozov
2:00-2:30 IR Magnet Expertise for Collaboration T. Michalski
2:30-3:00 IR Magnet FOA Proposal Discussion T. Michalski