Difference between revisions of "PITMinutes 06-18-2018"

From CASA Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Agenda and Notes)
(Attendance)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Attendance ==
 
== Attendance ==
  
R. Bachimanchi, K. Baggett, M. Drury, A. Freyberger, R. Geng, A. Hutton, G. Krafft, A. Kimber, R. Legg, C. Mounts, R. Nelson, T. Plawski, T. Powers, C. Reece, T. Reilly, R. Rimmer, and A. Solopova.
+
R. Bachimanchi, K. Baggett, M. Drury, A. Freyberger, R. Geng, C. Hovater, G. Krafft, A. Kimber, R. Legg, C. Mounts, R. Nelson, T. Plawski, T. Powers, C. Reece, T. Reilly, and A. Solopova.
  
 
== Agenda and Notes ==
 
== Agenda and Notes ==
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
During SAD two FEL modules being moved into
 
During SAD two FEL modules being moved into
NL07 and SL23 (a C100 is being removed). This first
+
NL07 and NL23 (a C100 is being removed). This first
 
C100 cryomodule will be used as a feeder for the C100
 
C100 cryomodule will be used as a feeder for the C100
 
refurbishment program. More on this below.
 
refurbishment program. More on this below.
Line 14: Line 14:
 
Current limits from previous minutes largely
 
Current limits from previous minutes largely
 
solved, if not completely understood, by injector
 
solved, if not completely understood, by injector
tuning elliminating beam haloes.
+
tuning elliminating beam haloes. Bunch length
 +
changes were effective in mitigating problem.
 +
Process Reza used could be incompatible with
 +
high quality parity measurements.
  
 
Some questions about HOM loads as installed in CEBAF.
 
Some questions about HOM loads as installed in CEBAF.
FEL configuration for all cavities after installation
+
P1 FEL configuration for all cavities after installation
 
back in CEBAF.
 
back in CEBAF.
  
Line 36: Line 39:
 
4. NEGS for C75? (Ciovati, Reilly)
 
4. NEGS for C75? (Ciovati, Reilly)
  
[https://casa.jlab.org/LINACPIT/1L13_WGfualts_112617-050618.JPG Waveguide Faults Summary]
+
[https://casa.jlab.org/LINACPIT/1L13_WGfaults_112617-050618.JPG Waveguide Faults Summary]
  
 
Answer to question: Yes!
 
Answer to question: Yes!

Latest revision as of 14:39, 18 June 2018

Attendance

R. Bachimanchi, K. Baggett, M. Drury, A. Freyberger, R. Geng, C. Hovater, G. Krafft, A. Kimber, R. Legg, C. Mounts, R. Nelson, T. Plawski, T. Powers, C. Reece, T. Reilly, and A. Solopova.

Agenda and Notes

1. Operations Status and Summary/Review (Freyberger)

During SAD two FEL modules being moved into NL07 and NL23 (a C100 is being removed). This first C100 cryomodule will be used as a feeder for the C100 refurbishment program. More on this below.

Current limits from previous minutes largely solved, if not completely understood, by injector tuning elliminating beam haloes. Bunch length changes were effective in mitigating problem. Process Reza used could be incompatible with high quality parity measurements.

Some questions about HOM loads as installed in CEBAF. P1 FEL configuration for all cavities after installation back in CEBAF.

2. Magnetic Flux Generated by Thermal Currents (Geng)

JLAB-TN-18-003

3. C100 Refurbishment Planning (Krafft, Reilly)

C100 System Improvement Discussion

Items Request Email

C100 Refurbishment Brainstorming List

Tony's C100 Refurbishment Brainstorming ppt

4. NEGS for C75? (Ciovati, Reilly)

Waveguide Faults Summary

Answer to question: Yes!

Action Items

Leadership of quenches. Offline discussion.

Complete C75 Module Specifications (Marhauser, Benesch, Krafft)

C100 Refurbishment Project for the future?