Difference between revisions of "PITMinutes 12-04-2017"
| (9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Attendance == | == Attendance == | ||
| − | R. Bachimanchi, K. Baggett, | + | R. Bachimanchi, K. Baggett, J. Benesch, G. Ciovati, C. Hovater, A. Freyberger, R. Geng, G. Krafft, A. Kimber, F. Marhauser, C. Mounts, T. Plawski, C. Reece, R. Rimmer, D. Seidman, and H. Wang. |
== Agenda and Notes == | == Agenda and Notes == | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
1. Operations Status and Summary (Freyberger) | 1. Operations Status and Summary (Freyberger) | ||
| − | Beam On! Physics starting. SRF systems detected, by tripping, the earthquake | + | Beam On! Physics starting. SRF systems detected, by tripping, the 5.1 Richter earthquake |
centerred in Dover, DE. | centerred in Dover, DE. | ||
2. C75 Cavity Performance Specifications Signoff (Krafft, Hovater, Freyberger) | 2. C75 Cavity Performance Specifications Signoff (Krafft, Hovater, Freyberger) | ||
| − | + | Frank and Gigi (mainly) have written up a C75 performance specification | |
| − | + | document. We are gathered here to: "Speak Now, or forever hold your peace!" | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | [https://casa.jlab.org/LINACPIT/2017-11-22_Draft_3.0.pdf JLAB-TN-17-055: Draft C75 Specification Document] | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| + | 3. C75 LLRF (Hovater) | ||
| − | [https://casa.jlab.org/LINACPIT/ | + | [https://casa.jlab.org/LINACPIT/C75_LLRF_Strategy.pptx Presentation on C75 LLRF] |
| − | + | 4. Draft Cryomodule Specification (Benesch) | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
Jay has written up a set of goals for the cryomodules: | Jay has written up a set of goals for the cryomodules: | ||
[https://casa.jlab.org/LINACPIT/2017CM_specR2.pdf Draft Cryomodule Specification] | [https://casa.jlab.org/LINACPIT/2017CM_specR2.pdf Draft Cryomodule Specification] | ||
| − | + | 5. Draft Acceptance Criteria (Legg) | |
| + | |||
Bob shared the LCLS II module acceptance criteria that the | Bob shared the LCLS II module acceptance criteria that the | ||
LCLS II project is working under. We should perhaps adopt something | LCLS II project is working under. We should perhaps adopt something | ||
| Line 46: | Line 41: | ||
Leadership of quenches. Offline discussion. | Leadership of quenches. Offline discussion. | ||
| − | Complete C75 Module Specifications (Marhauser, Krafft) | + | Complete C75 Module Specifications (Marhauser, Benesch, Krafft) |
C100 Refurbishment Project for the future? | C100 Refurbishment Project for the future? | ||
Latest revision as of 16:02, 4 December 2017
Attendance
R. Bachimanchi, K. Baggett, J. Benesch, G. Ciovati, C. Hovater, A. Freyberger, R. Geng, G. Krafft, A. Kimber, F. Marhauser, C. Mounts, T. Plawski, C. Reece, R. Rimmer, D. Seidman, and H. Wang.
Agenda and Notes
1. Operations Status and Summary (Freyberger)
Beam On! Physics starting. SRF systems detected, by tripping, the 5.1 Richter earthquake centerred in Dover, DE.
2. C75 Cavity Performance Specifications Signoff (Krafft, Hovater, Freyberger)
Frank and Gigi (mainly) have written up a C75 performance specification document. We are gathered here to: "Speak Now, or forever hold your peace!"
JLAB-TN-17-055: Draft C75 Specification Document
3. C75 LLRF (Hovater)
4. Draft Cryomodule Specification (Benesch)
Jay has written up a set of goals for the cryomodules: Draft Cryomodule Specification
5. Draft Acceptance Criteria (Legg)
Bob shared the LCLS II module acceptance criteria that the LCLS II project is working under. We should perhaps adopt something similar for C75? (Discuss Pros and Cons)
LCLS II Module Acceptance Criteria
Action Items
Leadership of quenches. Offline discussion.
Complete C75 Module Specifications (Marhauser, Benesch, Krafft)
C100 Refurbishment Project for the future?
