Difference between revisions of "PITMinutes 05-23-2016"
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
1. Operations Status and Summary | 1. Operations Status and Summary | ||
| − | B | + | B receiving beam again! |
| + | |||
Cryo hiccups resolved with work | Cryo hiccups resolved with work | ||
| − | + | Heater testing in R100 | |
Decarad measurements with all C100s | Decarad measurements with all C100s | ||
| − | + | Microphonic damping feet on 0L04: | |
didn't fit keep trying | didn't fit keep trying | ||
2. FE/Particulate Meeting Report (Geng) | 2. FE/Particulate Meeting Report (Geng) | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [https://jlabdoc/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-117729/16-008.pdf Field Emission/ Particulate Meeting Final Report] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Follow on activity and future planning | ||
Studies of warm girders next to the removed 1L12 cryomodule. | Studies of warm girders next to the removed 1L12 cryomodule. | ||
| − | + | Day time scales for looking. After Prad studies In July! | |
Dummy girder? Gives us maybe 2 weeks to study removed girder. | Dummy girder? Gives us maybe 2 weeks to study removed girder. | ||
| − | + | Replace ion pumps? Clean interior of both sides? | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
Latest revision as of 08:50, 6 June 2016
Attendance
R. Bachimanchi, M. Drury, A. Freyberger, C. Hovater, A. Hutton, G. Krafft, A. Kimber, C. Mounts, R. Nelson, T. Plawski, C. Reece
Agenda and Notes
1. Operations Status and Summary
B receiving beam again!
Cryo hiccups resolved with work
Heater testing in R100
Decarad measurements with all C100s
Microphonic damping feet on 0L04: didn't fit keep trying
2. FE/Particulate Meeting Report (Geng)
Follow on activity and future planning
Studies of warm girders next to the removed 1L12 cryomodule.
Day time scales for looking. After Prad studies In July!
Dummy girder? Gives us maybe 2 weeks to study removed girder.
Replace ion pumps? Clean interior of both sides?
3. Capture degradation rate?
Gradient calibrations have changed
Accounting for this, there hasn't been serious degradation?
monitoring going forward. Data archived.
Look at archiver data and compare?
Other ideas?
